ESEA Waiver Coalition Letter

Thursday, October 23, 2014

The Honorable Arne Duncan
Secretary of Education
U.S. Department of Education
400 Maryland Avenue, SW
Washington, D.C. 20202

Dear Secretary Duncan:

We write to express our utmost concern that under the current Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) waivers, state accountability systems are masking the academic performance of individual student groups, including students of color, low-income students, English-Language learners, and students with disabilities.  We strongly urge the U.S. Department of Education (ED) to correct course and ensure that in the next round of waiver renewals, states must make the achievement and attainment of each group of students count in ratings for all schools.  Moreover, underperformance for any groups of students must trigger meaningful supports and interventions.[i]

A recent analysis of data from new state systems shows that school rating systems do not account for the achievement and growth of individual groups of students in a meaningful way. A school with an “A” rating may only be academically preparing its white or affluent students, while African-American, Latino or low-income students are not seeing the same academic progress or achievement.  Moreover, 16 states and territories have received waivers but do not require interventions when individual student groups miss their graduation rate targets.

Our organizations, which advocate for groups of students that have historically been underserved by our nation’s education system, will stand up to ensure that these students matter. We have, unfortunately, returned to a time when schools are being sent the message that it is not important for all their students to reach their academic potential. It is critical for ED’s waiver renewal guidance to include strong policy regarding student subgroups, as this policy could be in place for up to four years and will set a precedent for the eventual reauthorization of ESEA. We are ready and prepared to work with you to make sure that school accountability systems account for and respond to the achievement and graduation of all student groups.



[i] ED’s 2013 initial waiver renewal guidance issued on August 29, 2013 (paragraph 10), as well as guidance issued on March 5, 2013 (question C-48b), specifically required states to ensure that interventions are provided in Title I schools when one or more subgroups miss AMOs or graduation rate targets. Waiver renewal guidance must align with these policies asserted by ED.


Recent Policies

Mar 13 2018 Urban League Opposes Nomination of Thomas Farr as U.S. District Judge for Eastern District of North Carolina Dear Senator:   On behalf of the National Urban League and its 90 local affiliates in urban communities across 37 states, including North Carolina, and the District of Columbia, I write to express our strong opposition to the nomination of Thomas Farr as United States District Judge for the Eastern... Read
Mar 12 2018 Urban League Against So-Called "STOP School Violence Act" Dear Speaker Ryan and Democratic Leader Pelosi:   On behalf of the National Urban League and its 90 local affiliates in urban communities across 37 states and the District of Columbia, we urge you to oppose H.R.4909, the STOP School Violence Act. We are concerned that the anonymous reporting and... Read
Mar 12 2018 African-American Civil Rights Leaders Strongly Urge Attorney General Sessions to Include Civil Rights in DOJ’s Priorities Dear Attorney General Sessions,   We write in response to reports describing a draft of Strategic Plan of the Department of Justice, setting forth the priorities that will be the focus of the Department’s work for the coming four years. Enforcing the nation’s civil rights laws does not appear among... Read
Mar 07 2018 Urban League Letter to Senate With Recommendations for HEA Reauthorization Dear Chairman Alexander and Ranking Member Murray:
Mar 07 2018 Urban League Letter to HUD Secretary Carson Imploring Rejection of Changes to Mission Statement Dear Secretary Carson,   It is with the utmost urgency I respectfully implore you to reject removal of anti-discrimination language from your department’s mission statement.